AI Media Release - Gary Reese
Afghan Detainees Transferred To Torture
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL SEEKS ASSURANCES FROM NZ DEFENCE FORCE
5th December 2007
Amnesty
International's (AI) latest report on Afghanistan "Detainees
transferred to torture: ISAF complicity?" outlines that the NATO-led
International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan is
exposing detainees to real risks of torture, other ill-treatment and
arbitrary detention by Afghanistan's intelligence service, the National
Directorate of Security (NDS).
Amnesty International is
concerned that ISAF troops from New Zealand operating in Afghanistan
and particularly the Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) could be
involved in transferring detainees to Afghan security forces.
While
New Zealand was not one of those countries surveyed in the AI report,
NZ is a participant in the ISAF and has a Provincial Reconstruction
Team in Afghanistan. "We are particularly concerned that the NZ PRT, as
part of its task in maintaining security in Bamyan Province involving
frequent patrols throughout the province NZ Defence Force website; 3rd
Nov 2007; http://www.nzdf.mil.nz/operations/deployments/afghanistan/default.htm
"The NZ PRT (107 personnel as of October 2007) Bamyan is tasked with
maintaining security in Bamyan Province. It does this by conducting
frequent presence patrols throughout the province.", may apprehend and
transfer detainees," says Amnesty International Spokesperson Gary Reese.
In
March this year, Amnesty International raised our concerns to Hon Phil
Goff, Minister of Defence, that the 50-70 detainees handed over to U.S.
forces by the NZ SAS could be subject to torture at Guantanamo Bay or
other secret detention centres in a third country (through the US
practice of 'extraordinary rendition'). The responses from the New
Zealand Defence Force to Amnesty questions at this time were vague and
unsatisfactory. Assurances from the Minister of Defence that the
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) would follow up any
persons transferred by NZ Forces is inconsistent with statements to
Amnesty International from the ICRC in Afghanistan. (See 'Notes to
Editor' for further details).
"Amnesty International was very
concerned that 50-70 detainees handed over to US forces, sometime
before December 2005, may have been subjected to torture at Guantanamo
Bay or other secret detention camps" says Gary Reese. "It is now
important that the New Zealand Government ensure that no detainees will
be handed over to Afghan Security forces, who are also known to be
using severe torture techniques".
"We have again written to the
Hon Phil Goff, questioning whether any detainees have been handed over
to the Afghan authorities by New Zealand's PRT or ISAF personnel." says
Gary Reese. "We have also sought a commitment to a moratorium on any
future transfers of detainees to Afghan security forces."
Amnesty
International's research and the work of others has now revealed a
pattern of human rights violations, perpetrated with impunity by Afghan
NDS personnel. Scores of NDS detainees, some arrested arbitrarily and
detained incommunicado, that is without access to defence lawyers,
families, courts or other outside bodies, have been subjected to
torture and other ill-treatment, including being whipped, exposed to
extreme cold, deprived of food and shocked with electrical probes.
"We
were taken to the NDS compound in Kandahar…I was beaten on my back and
especially my kidneys with a metal cable... After some 50-60 cable
blows, I fell unconscious…A metal bar was placed under my chained arms
and knees and I was hung from the hook on the ceiling and they
continued to beat me. I was hung in this position for maybe one hour
and lost consciousness." – Testimony given to Amnesty International in
December 2005.
The report details Amnesty International's
primary concern that by transferring detainees to Afghan authorities,
states are in breach of international law, requiring states not to send
detainees into a situation where they are at substantial risk of
torture or other ill-treatment. This is the principle of
non-refoulement which is absolute and allows for no exceptions.
End
Resources
The full report is available at: http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGASA110112007?open&of=ENG-AFG
Notes to Editor
- Hon
Phil Goff Minister, Minister of Defence was quoted in the NZ Herald on
28th February 2007 as saying the NZ Defence Force negotiated a deal
with the ICRC to follow up on any prisoners NZ Defence Forces helped to
capture. A report from the Minister to the Foreign Affairs, Defence,
and Trade Committee on 27th February also stated that the Chief of
Defence has put in place procedures for the notification of the ICRC of
any persons captured.
- However when Amnesty International tried to confirm this arrangement, the ICRC office in Afghanistan advised us on the 7th March 2007 that they "had not received any information from NZ authorities of any arrests or transfers in Afghanistan". They also advised that their role "is not to monitor the whereabouts or treatment of detained persons on behalf of a third party, be it a government or another party".
- The
NZ Defence Force in a written response, dated 13th April 2007, to
Amnesty International on the whereabouts of the 50-70 people detained
by the SAS stated that "the information received from the United States
was that no person in its custody could be identified as having been
among those people temporarily detained by NZ Forces".
- This response does not give Amnesty International confidence that any of these detainees are not still being held in Guantanamo Bay or part of the US practice of 'extraordinary rendition' of detainees to secret detention centres in third countries.
- A NZ Herald report of 27th February quotes unnamed sources that NZ soldiers were concerned that some detainees handed over by them were not properly identified, photographed or fingerprinted. If these claims are true, any tracking of the whereabouts of those detained by the NZ SAS would now be very difficult.